
So, this reversal marks only partial progress, according to gay rights advocates who point out that it's not who you are but what you do that determines your risk for HIV. "The FDA should update the Donor History Questionnaire so that all potential donors are screened for high-risk behavior, regardless of sexual orientation,"argues GMHC. "Only prospective donors determined to be high-risk should be subject to deferral periods."
It's not only the rights of gay and bisexual men at stake in this debate, but also the lives that could be saved by a greater expansion of blood-donor eligibility. A report released last year by the UCLA Williams Institute estimated that lifting the ban on men who have sex with men would add 360,600 men to the blood-donor pool; together, they could donate 615,300 pints. Since each donation can be used to save three patients' lives, those 615,300 pints represent the ability to save 1.8 million lives per year. While the U.S. is not alone in its new 12-month deferral policy (the U.K. and Australia have the same), advocacy groups will continue to push for a policy that reflects potential donors' health risks, not their identities.
Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?
Here's What It Really Looks Like To Lose 120 Pounds
Striking Photos Of A Burlesque Performer Before & After Makeup (NSFW)
12 Striking Photos Show What Happens When Health Care Comes Too Late